Talk:List of codepointers: Difference between revisions
From Eternity Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→zolpidem from india, ambien toxicity,: new section) |
m (Reverted edits by 89.178.207.116 (talk) to last revision by Bloodshedder) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I noticed some codepointers, mainly the ones with parameters, have been documented here with type specifiers in them (int, float, string...). While I know they're there for information purposes, do they actually have this form in the source? Normally all misc1, misc2 and args[] are of type int in the source, so this type naming I think it's pseudocode at most.--[[User:Printz|Printz]] 05:57, 29 May 2009 (EDT) | I noticed some codepointers, mainly the ones with parameters, have been documented here with type specifiers in them (int, float, string...). While I know they're there for information purposes, do they actually have this form in the source? Normally all misc1, misc2 and args[] are of type int in the source, so this type naming I think it's pseudocode at most.--[[User:Printz|Printz]] 05:57, 29 May 2009 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 04:19, 2 October 2016
I noticed some codepointers, mainly the ones with parameters, have been documented here with type specifiers in them (int, float, string...). While I know they're there for information purposes, do they actually have this form in the source? Normally all misc1, misc2 and args[] are of type int in the source, so this type naming I think it's pseudocode at most.--Printz 05:57, 29 May 2009 (EDT)
