Talk:List of codepointers: Difference between revisions

From Eternity Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Reverted edits by 89.178.207.116 (talk) to last revision by Bloodshedder)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I noticed some codepointers, mainly the ones with parameters, have been documented here with type specifiers in them (int, float, string...). While I know they're there for information purposes, do they actually have this form in the source? Normally all misc1, misc2 and args[] are of type int in the source, so this type naming I think it's pseudocode at most.--[[User:Printz|Printz]] 05:57, 29 May 2009 (EDT)
I noticed some codepointers, mainly the ones with parameters, have been documented here with type specifiers in them (int, float, string...). While I know they're there for information purposes, do they actually have this form in the source? Normally all misc1, misc2 and args[] are of type int in the source, so this type naming I think it's pseudocode at most.--[[User:Printz|Printz]] 05:57, 29 May 2009 (EDT)
== zolpidem 5 mg tablet, buy zolpidem cheap, ==
ambien generic names ambien controlled substance ambien purchase <a href=>ambien high</a>. buy glucophage cost of generic ambien ambian sleep zolpidem where to buy . ambien online purchase  cheap generic ambien . can you buy zolpidem online ambien 10mg effects  ambien usa ambien 10 milligrams buy ambien fedex delivery two ambien

Latest revision as of 04:19, 2 October 2016

I noticed some codepointers, mainly the ones with parameters, have been documented here with type specifiers in them (int, float, string...). While I know they're there for information purposes, do they actually have this form in the source? Normally all misc1, misc2 and args[] are of type int in the source, so this type naming I think it's pseudocode at most.--Printz 05:57, 29 May 2009 (EDT)