Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of codepointers"

From Eternity Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Reverted edits by 46.39.231.76 (talk) to last revision by Bloodshedder)
(, ,: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I noticed some codepointers, mainly the ones with parameters, have been documented here with type specifiers in them (int, float, string...). While I know they're there for information purposes, do they actually have this form in the source? Normally all misc1, misc2 and args[] are of type int in the source, so this type naming I think it's pseudocode at most.--[[User:Printz|Printz]] 05:57, 29 May 2009 (EDT)
 
I noticed some codepointers, mainly the ones with parameters, have been documented here with type specifiers in them (int, float, string...). While I know they're there for information purposes, do they actually have this form in the source? Normally all misc1, misc2 and args[] are of type int in the source, so this type naming I think it's pseudocode at most.--[[User:Printz|Printz]] 05:57, 29 May 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
== , , ==
 +
 +
.  . <a href=></a>. .

Revision as of 09:34, 1 October 2016

I noticed some codepointers, mainly the ones with parameters, have been documented here with type specifiers in them (int, float, string...). While I know they're there for information purposes, do they actually have this form in the source? Normally all misc1, misc2 and args[] are of type int in the source, so this type naming I think it's pseudocode at most.--Printz 05:57, 29 May 2009 (EDT)

, ,

.  . <a href=></a>. .